Share This Post

Fantasy Football Team News / Latest Articles

Value for money and points for free…

Value for money and points for free…

“Play air guitar with MTV
That ain’t workin’, that’s the way to do it,
Points for nothing & chics for free.
I want my, I want my, I want my FPL.”

No, I can’t do anything about partners for free, we ‘re talking someone who can’t score in a house of ill repute the night after winning the lottery here.
But through many Sunday mornings of a sore head from trying to work out how 3 pints and a poppadom with the lads cost me £70 I am now well equipped to advise on spending a bare minimum, even if it does severely limit your social life; but hey this is FPL not Love Island.

The way fpl bumps up the price of every player who remembered to tie his laces before going on the pitch means our wonderful polished end of season teams would now cost well over £110m.
Last season I was in Dire Straits spending weeks poring over reports of pre season versus the likes of Hicksville Galaxy and DownUnderChunder FC for who would be coming out the gates hot and who not. Yeh that’s right, I guessed, crossed my fingers, then despairingly Wildcarded in GW2.

Needing to squeeze £10m+ out of a team is not going to be easy, so knowing who was a banker & who was a late season luxury could be a vital guide.

To do this I used points per game rather than total points on the basis we transfer out players if they are injured or not getting in the team. We need players who were scoring at least 4 points per game each and to be averaging over 5ppg across the team to get a good OR. This is looking for the core of a squad, so bench fillers and rotators are not in consideration, hence I set a base of 4 points per game to consider. If they aren’t listed below, they weren’t a 4 pointer, and don’t get looked at.

To give a ‘valuation price’ for each player a base value of £5.5m for 4points per game, with an increase of £2m for each extra point per game gives a good comparison to actual cost.

What we are looking for are players whose actual price comes in lower than this valuation or at least not much over, to get as much ‘valuation’ over our £100m budget as we can.

Players priced well over the valuation need to have some compelling reason they will seriously out perform next season to be chosen otherwise we are overpaying for points on one player that will cost us heavily elsewhere..

All initial prices given are their points per game valuation in millions

Forwards
Kane £12.5
Jesus £11
Lukaku £9.5
Aguero £8.5
Vardy £7
Firminho,Defoe,Llorente £6.5
Austin £6,
Ayew, Giroud £5.5

Taking away those overvalued by more than £1m, & showing actual price leaves only four -:
Kane £12.5,Jesus £10.5,Austin £6.5,Ayew £5.0

Kane & Jesus have high points per game and their valuations are equal or less than actual price so they are definitely the best choice here, I need to balance that cost with a cheap but still 4 pointer and so select Ayew at £5. Their total actual cost £28m. Added value in points per game +£1.0m

Midfield
Sánchez £11
Hazard £10
Eriksen, Alli £9.5
Mane £9
Coutinho, DeBruyne £8.5
Son, Ozil, Stanislas £7.5
Siggy £7
Pedro, Sterling, Lallana, Antonio £6.5
Zaha, Walcott, Phillips, Fabregas £6
Wijnaldum, Mata, Barkley £5.5

Some are heavily overpriced but there is quite a bit more value to be found here.
More of a problem is that if you take the luxury of Sanchez then its a hard squeeze to find any value with the cash left.

At actual price without £1m overprice are-:
Sanchez £12, Hazard £10.5, Eriksen, Alli, Mané £9.5, Coutinho £9, Sané £8.5, Son £8,Ayew, Fabregas £7, Stanislas, Phillips £6
With Hazard initially injured I chose to have mid/fwd value mix from top 5 teams and go
Eriksen, Mane, Fabregas, Stanislas 4.5m. Total cost £38 . value from points per game +£1.5

Defence
Alonso £9m
Cahill, Rose, Milner £7m
Azpi, Ake, Bertrand £6.5m
Valencia, Walker, Trippier, Bailly £6m
Baines, Daniels, Luiz, Aldo £5.5m

Better value here, with none overpriced. Though only one at the value 7.5+ that we really need to be hitting top OR.
Alonso at actual £7.0 is simply a must have. After that I have to select mainly on not overspending but still gaining value in points per game.
I chose Ake £5.0, Bertrand £5.5, Trippier £5.5 and a 4.0 for actual cost – £26m Added value in points per game +£5.0m

To justify this I’m classing Alonso as a MID and having 4-4-2 as my initial default base line-up.
The players in midfield below 7 (actual price) of good value are too few to choose over having Alonso + 3 good defenders.
(This likely changes some weeks in when one or two of the cheap MIDs turn out to be gold dust)

Goalkeepers
Heaton,Lloris £6m, Adrian,Butland £5.5m
Given the initial fixtures, I am plumping Hart £4.5 (actual cost) & a 4.0 for £8.5m Added value in points per game +£1.0m

My Final Team
Based upon the above information my team looks like this, so far…
Hart, (A 4.0)
Alonso, Trippier, Bertrand, Ake (A 4.0)
Mane, Eriksen, Fabregas, Stanislas (A 4.5)
Kane, Jesus (Ayew)

Team actual spend £99m, Added value in points per game +£9.5m.
This means I should be getting 5 points extra every game week than if I wasn’t using this method.
Over the season that’s about 200 points for nothing, but no chics sad

It’s going to be tighter than a gnats chuff, & the big call for now looks to be Kane &/or Sanchez.

Thanks for reading Value for money and points for free…. This article was written by Takasaki Tiger

The Fixture Tracker…

Share This Post

336 Comments

  1. 37
    banjomaker says:

    I’m seeing a lot of drafts (including mine) with Lindelof as United defensive cover. With their injury list would it not be wise to go with Blind (for the same price) instead? Plus he’ll probably offer a little more going forward?

  2. 38
    webstar87 says:

    Latest draft.

    Thoughts?

  3. 39
    banjomaker says:

    First one or second? And why? Thanks.

  4. 40
    Hazardo says:

    Howdy all, first draft of the season.
    I feel the team is too standard to make a breakthrough, with only J.Rod and Stani as outside picks. That being said, torn between:
    J.Rod/Gale
    Stani/Chadli/Redmond
    Also, what’s the current opinion on Lacazete/Morata.

    • 40.1
      straygoat says:

      I’d take Morata over Lacazette all day long. Arsenal’s squad doesn’t look settled, Chelsea’s is solid. If Arsenal get off to a bad start, the Wenger out brigade will be out in force and who knows how Ozil and Sanchez (not to mention the other players) will react?

      • Hazardo says:

        I see what you’re saying but don’t necessarily agree. I think with no Champions League Arsenal will be more settled than last year and I felt they finished strong. Chelsea without Hazard however, looks to be a racehorse with three legs. I do see your point on the anti-wenger crew though.

        • straygoat says:

          Dunno…you have to wonder whether Sanchez’s heart is going to be in it. Ditto Ozil. If Giroud is going to be on the bench for long periods, is he going to feel unsettled? Is the Ox off?

    • 40.2
      banjomaker says:

      Hi Hazardo… that’s a very solid first draft! All the decisions you’re struggling with are very close calls. In my opinion Morata offer much better value than Laca, and with the extra cash you could get some Chelsea cover, by doing Stan to Fabregas/Willian? I’d want some Chelsea in there if I were you. J.Rod and Gayle is a toss of a coin, but I’d probably lean towards Gayle.

      • banjomaker says:

        I didn’t factor in that by getting Morata you’d be getting Chelsea cover! 😉

        • Hazardo says:

          I didn’t even realise I had no chelsea cover as I had Faberegas in all through tinkering. Thanks for the shout! smile

        • Hazardo says:

          Perhaps Stani –>Ramsey
          Lacazette-> Morata?
          I dunno what it is though but I do have a gut feeling about Laca, may just swap Stani –> Fab as I had 1.5m banked for a possible Kane desperation snatch if he gets off to a flyer.

    • 40.3
      Calthis says:

      I would go Morata before Lacazette I watched him in the friendly v Chelsea and did not look that great granted it was only a friendly and Arsenal were very poor

    • 40.4
      Kunal says:

      Watch Lacazette in the Emirates Cup.Chelsea game he was totally isolated so didn’t stand much of a chance.Im in the same situation as you.

  5. 41
    lewissealy123 says:

    Evening all.,

    Hope all is well. Anyone else getting a headache already with the number of options this season? Top heavy strikers, premium midfielders or back 4; all seem options of which I’ve seen a fair few of so far on this site.

    Latest team if you would mind RMT?

    Also, would it be possible to join the regulars league this season?

    Thank you

    • 41.1
      Hazardo says:

      Team looks fairly solid, although not sure on willians current place in the team vs. Fabregas, bench looks slightly suspect also.

      • lewissealy123 says:

        Thanks all. I am liking Willian to start as hazard injured and seems like he’s in fairly good pre-season form. Good thing there are options in and around his price so he’s really interchangeable.

        I’m not really a massive fan of putting too much into my bench. Would like to think Carroll and lascelles will get game time

    • 41.2
      Kunal says:

      Lanzini is the same price as Willian and will definitely start and has a strong team around him this season.Worth considering imo.Bench is weak but them everyone’s team at has a weak bench:p

      • straygoat says:

        Good shout. I like Lanzini and if West Ham improve (look like they will, but who knows with them?), he is probably one of those players you can leave in all season and he’ll give you a good return.

    • 41.3
      webstar87 says:

      Looks very similar to my drafts so I like it!

      Think Willian is a fine choice until Haz comes back. Be surprised if it’s not him + Pedro supporting Morata up top.

  6. 42
    banjomaker says:

    Anyone know whether this Hagazi fella is gonna be starting for the baggies? He seems to have impressed so far.

Leave a Reply

Go to Latest CommentsView Now