FPL Fixtures Analysis Gameweek 5 2016-17
Welcome to FPL Fixtures Analysis Gameweek 5 2016-17.
There’s a great Louis CK bit at the beginning of one of his specials where he acknowledges that he has trouble knowing what to say to start his show. It’s tough. Too much preamble and it sounds forced, but not enough banter at the top makes it look like you just don’t care about proper etiquette as you talk to your audience. I kind of wanted to get this intro right because it’s a huge shift for me on this site. Starting this round, I’ll be taking over the Fixtures article on a weekly basis.
I know, right? What does the MLS guy know about tracking and predicting Premier League fixtures? Well I know more than some and less than others, but I’m punctual in writing articles and I’m fanatical about watching live games, so I guess I was a good fit. If you think I’m any good in this capacity, you can steer your team in the direction I’m pointing. If you think I’m absolute rubbish, then you’ll know to automatically pick against me. Either way, we all win.
Now that we have that out of the way, it seems to me that picking fixtures at all is a bit of a fool’s errand this year. Honestly, as I was sitting down to study stats and results over the weekend it became pretty clear that many results would’ve been just as accurately predicted with a coin toss as opposed to study. In GW1 through GW3 the away teams won just as many times as the home teams with 11 wins each (for the mathematically challenged, the other 8 fixtures ended in a draw). And in GW4 (with the Everton game still yet to be played as of the writing of this article), another 4 wins were tallied by away teams with only 3 home teams winning over the weekend.
So what does this mean? It means that I have an excuse if my picks go south, let’s get that out of the way quickly. But it also means that possibly some of the new money in the league is creating a bit more parity than we’ve seen in the past. Sure, the big teams are still at the top of the table – but the waters have been sufficiently muddied this year, and I think it makes for great viewing.
So was that too much preamble? Let’s just get to the picks.
The Tracker in full…
Top 3 Best Bets
#1) Everton – MID (H), BOU (A), CRY (H)
[three_fifth padding=”0 20px 0 0″]
[/three_fifth]
Full disclosure: I’m a huge Everton fan, so I’ll always try to find the best possible lens with which to view my beloved team. But this week, I don’t need a special lens with which to view my team, they’re actually primed to go up against lesser competition and have a pair of home fixtures over their next three to boot. And are of course showing some fine form.
Looking at their competition we see Middlesbrough trying their absolute hardest to be a middle of the table team this year – they’re not horrible, but they’re nothing special either. The only win Middlesbrough have this year came on the road to Sunderland; but let’s face it, Sunderland are in the relegation zone for a reason, and that win doesn’t prove much. Moving to Bournemouth, we see that they’re one of a handful of teams that aren’t averaging even a goal a game yet this year, so the fact that they’re in the bottom half isn’t all that surprising. Palace could shape up to be a bit of a challenge if their new attack continues to jell, but as of now, they’re not much to worry about for the better staffed Toffees.
All of Everton’s next opponents are averaging a goal or more allowed per match, so investing in Everton attack isn’t a horrible idea. In fact after tonight’s sudden awakening of a certain sleeping giant then it may be a high priority for some.
#2) Watford – MUN (H), BUR (A), BOU (H)
[three_fifth padding=”0 20px 0 0″]
[/three_fifth]
Stay with me here, because right off the bat many people will be thinking that Watford should be disqualified here in this spot because of the Man U game. And maybe that’s fair, but there are merits to this placement – at least if you’re looking to pick up on the Watford attack (because nobody should be liking them for their defensive prowess). But let’s be honest, it’s very tough to find a run of 3 fixtures that is absolutely perfect for a team – but like they say, 2 out of 3 ain’t bad.
Glancing over the Man U game, it’s the Burnley and Bournemouth fixtures that really making picking up the Watford attack more enticing. At the very least, we’ll all probably start by moving Capoue from the bench to the pitch… This pick essentially boils down to the fact that Watford are leading the league in shots converted at 18.4%. They may not have the massive shot volume of some of the other teams, but they’re converting at a stellar percentage this year, and it can’t be overlooked. So as to keep this a fixtures article and not a tips article, we have to look at why this stat applies to the second and third games while also making the attacking options from Watford so critical.
Burnley and Bournemouth have conceded 40 and 39 shots from inside the box respectively this year – for perspective, Stoke are the worst team at 42 shots conceded from inside the box. So they’re both pretty awful in this respect. Pairing the porous nature of the two defenses and combining them with Watford’s best-in-class accuracy should make for a couple of big gains for both club and fantasy owners. And who knows, the way this season is going, and based on Watford’s big explosion last round, maybe starting a Watford attacker against Man U isn’t the worst idea in the world either.
#3) Man City – BOU (H), SWA (A), TOT (A)
[three_fifth padding=”0 20px 0 0″]
[/three_fifth]
Looking at the table, this last choice was essentially down to either Man City or Tottenham, and by default I decided to give the nod to the first place team in the league. Man City are a juggernaut of offense so far this year – they’ve yet to be denied less than two goals in any match this season. So really, when this team goes up against, well, anybody, the fixture is favorable.
I don’t need to beat up on Bournemouth anymore here, so the advice from the last section also applies here (as an aside, Man City are 3rd in the league in shots converted). But further carrying our theme over from above, Swansea are the second worst team in the league at conceding shots from inside the box with 41 – so City are going to have a pretty easy time taking their shots in both of these first two fixtures. And if the data holds up, they should hold to their 2+ goal average per game without much trouble for the next couple of rounds.
The Tottenham game away should give people a bit of pause since the Spurs have proven to be one of the stingiest defenses in the league this year. But unlike buying Watford, for example, owning a player from Man City is typically a longer term investment that can withstand a troubling fixture much more easily. Either way, 7 points from the next three fixtures are certainly achievable for City, and 9 points aren’t out of the question by any stretch.
Teams To Avoid
Bournemouth – MCI (A), EVE (H), WAT (A)
OK, I’m really not trying to pick on them anymore, but it should be noted that all of the teams I selected above all have Bournemouth in common as one of their matches. Simply put, they’re going to be overmatched for much of this next stretch and should be avoided in all areas of fantasy play. They’re not proficient scorers and they’re not so good at keeping opposing offenses away. In all honesty though, the only players this run of fixtures will affect will be Boruc owners; the Bournemouth keeper tops the team’s ‘selected by’ percentage at 5.0%. Even as your backup keeper, he won’t be much use to you for this stretch.
Hull City – ARS (A), LIV (H), CHE (A)
Oof. It seems like everybody has at least flirted with the idea of having a Hull City fantasy darling on their squad at one point or another – but this isn’t the time to take a flier on a cheap mid or forward option for this team. On the surface, at least by name recognition, this is probably the worst 3-game stretch that any club has coming up over the next several weeks. Each of these three opponents that Hull will be facing have had their blunders: Arsenal giving up 4 at home to Liverpool, Liverpool losing 0-2 to Burnley and Chelsea drawing to Swansea. But really, even if Hull do luck out and get a positive result in a flukey game against one of these three, the chances that they can do it more than once is slim to none. Best to avoid picking these guys up any time soon.
Stoke – CRY (A), WBA (H), MU (A)
This is just stating the obvious, but Stoke are really really bad this year. On paper, they have mid-table talent, but they’re playing like a club that’s looking for the glory of one day winning the Championship. Any team in the league right now has to be chomping at the bit to play Stoke – they’ve conceded a league leading 10 goals, and they’re league worst in goals forward with 2. A pair of away games to Crystal and Man U isn’t doing Stoke any favors, and hosting West Brom is going to be a challenge because even though they rarely score, West Brom also rarely concede. It’s no stretch to think that Stoke’s goal differential could go from -8 to -14 by the time this run has concluded.
One Week Punt
Leicester – BUR (H)
[three_fifth padding=”0 20px 0 0″]
[/three_fifth]
This week I’m going to highlight Leicester because I think that most football fans are educated enough to know that it’s equally likely this team is going through a rough patch as opposed to being fundamentally broken. As fantasy players we have short memories – never mind that they won the entire league last year, what have they done for me lately? And it’s true, Leicester have underperformed.
This week though, you have to love their matchup. If you’re holding onto Vardy or Mahrez, don’t rage sell quite yet, give it one more chance. We touched on Burnley above, and we know that they give up shots. What you probably have missed this season is that Leicester are tied with Man City for big chances created with 11. Man City have converted their chances for the most part, Leicester have not. But the fact that this team is still just as creative as the league leaders should be encouraging. If they start to convert these chances, they’ll be dangerous – and viable in fantasy – once again.
Guy
I’d like to throw my thanks on the mountain of praise for your maiden Fixtures article. I will look forward to reading you every week on FPL matters and I think we’ll be in good hands judging on this opening one. Top effort.
I will also continue this FMLS struggle and for those who don’t play it I scored 149 points this past week thanks to Guy’s help! Dig that :ok:
Thanks once again Guy. :thumbup:
149? BOOOM! That’s awesome. I got caught in the Drogba captaincy – but that’s stellar.
And thanks for the compliment on the fixtures. I do appreciate it.
well I am not really a fan of MLS
but 149 is like a jackpot :0
great job Sir
Hi guys, just wondering if anyone is giving Champions League fantasy a bash this year?
I’ve created a league if anyone fancies joining. Link is http://uclfantasy.uefa.com/en/leagues/join?leaguecode=4E6F686F706572732323313934323823237777772E74686573746174737A6F6E652E636F6D2323313934323843324F
Because a weekend fix isn’t enough!
Thank you for the invite mate.
I’ve joined
I’m in, thank you.
Feel free to join ours but don’t share it on twitter please –
11353QTF
I’m in as well. Cheers, Undercover.
In.
Me too.Anyone know of 2 4mill defenders who will play? Or may play?
Kruscampo – Grimaldo from benfica is the only nailed defender at 4.0 that I’m aware about.
Cheers DMC
Kruz
Cristian Gamboa of Celtic and Nicolai Boilesen of Copenhagen but neither are certainties and might only play bits and pieces.
Cheers GP one of them will do as the other defender on the bench.
Kruz, Kimpembe at PSG should play and is 4.0m. Not sure you’d want him for today but at least you can sub him out if he concedes
Afternoon!
So I did Hazard >> Antonio and Negredo >> Lukaku this morning, were they the right moves for me? Decided to keep sterling because of his great fixtures, will get some Chelsea cover soon with Costa, and haven’t yet thought about Aguero…. Already on a -4 now so don’t want to do anymore moves
Don’t think it was a wise move to get rid of Hazard, if you had Costa it would have been sensible. Well what’s done is done Antonio isn’t bad either so hope it works out for you
Veer
Yeah I probably wouldn’t have jumped in already with your moves seeing as you have 5 players potentially playing competitive football before the deadline.
If you survive though, you have brought in good players but I’m not sure ditching Hazard was the right thing to do.
Not absolutely supportive of the decision of ditching Hazard, but Costa does seem like a primary candidate to get Chelsea cover.
What is it with the Gray mystery? This one feels likes it involves lawyers. Is it possible they’re negotiating amongst a suspension, a fine, or community service? Someone wisely pointed out that the FA was supposed to wind this stuff up in the week of filing, to prevent “game shopping”. Very strange.
KI, I think you are 100% correct in that this is particularly sensitive due to the subject matters of his tweets. I wouldn’t be surprised if this has creates a legal mess, not purely because of what he tweeted but when he tweeted them.
I would imagine the defence has built up a pretty good case of the “time lapse” etc. i would think we hear today or tomorrow and the hearing will be later this week.
Cookie,
Thanks very much for this. Caught up in Aguero moves, and Gray may have stay another week-hopefully as a live sub (even against United).
Hey all, anyone offer up some options for this bunch? Issues all over the pitch.
2FT, 3.3 itb
DeGea, Jaku
TERRY, Baines, Stones (Amat, Friend)
Haz, REDMOND, LAMELA, BARKLEY, Fletcher
Costa, Ibra, GRAY
Hey Colriles,
Difficult to advise before we hear about Gray but i would ditch Terry for Kos for now. Well, after Arsenal’s CL match anyway!
That team deserves not 1, but 2 wild cards.
Thanks B, that makes me feel better 😉